Leaked Leaks

We have no doubts about where our sympathies lie in this clash of values. And yet we cannot let those sympathies transform us into propagandists, even for a system we respect.

This is from a captivating, entertaining and very open account on how his paper dealt with WikiLeaks from Bill Keller, the New York Times' executive editor. Very long, and totally worth your time.

(via Sandboxer David Bauer's "Weekly Filet", a weekly selection of high-quality information nutrition. I suggest you subscribe to it. Like, now.)

Three quick thoughts on Egypt

  1. One of the main reasons quoted in favor of the internet as an instrument of political change is its resilience - the fact that it is very difficult to control or even to shut down. As of today, we know that at least in some cases, the internet actually can be shut down.
  2. Ironically, the decision of the Egyptian government to completely disconnect the country might prove to be the spark that transforms the protest into a full-blown revolt.
  3. The debate on the role of the internet in situations like these will continue. On one hand, the Egyptian government obviously sees internet services as a threat, suggesting it has (or had) a crucial role in coordinating protests. On the other hand, the protests have continued even with the internet down - suggesting that it was not the driving force behind the protests.

If you want to follow the situation in Egypt, you can watch Al Jazeera English live here, or follow Jan25 Voices on Twitter, where reports out of Egypt are aggregated.

Baby, Let Me Unfollow You

Unfollowing on Twitter.

Two sociologists have conducted a study on "unfollow behavior" on Twitter. They have discovered that, over a time period of 6 months, the average Twitter user in their sample lost 39% of his or her followers. They also looked at which factors had an influence on the probability of unfollowing in a given "pair" of Twitter users. Reciprocity (are the users following each other) lowered the probability of an unfollow, as did the overall follow-back ratio of a Twitter user, and the "embeddedness", i.e. how many mutual "friends" the two users had. 

This is all hardly surprising (except maybe for the figure of 39% of unfollows - I had expected a much lower number), since it mirrors real-life behavior: The closer two people are, and tighter they are integrated into the same social network, the lower the probability that relationship is (for whatever reason) terminated. But it might suggest that social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook provide a vast field for sociologists (and other social scientists) to study human behavior - because on these platforms, data on relationships between users is easily available, and scientists don't need to rely on interviews and experiments.

An internal innovation community for New York

New York City is using an online community platform to enable its employees to post, rate and comment on ideas that could improve the city's service. The platform is powered by a company named Spigit. The company has also worked with the tiny city of Manor, Texas, which has become a pioneer in "Gov 2.0". For Manor's story and other good examples, see also this overview article by Fast Company.

Commandments for journalists

The Guardian has a great list of 25 commandments for journalists. My favorite is number 7:

7. If in doubt, assume the reader knows nothing. However, never make the mistake of assuming that the reader is stupid. The classic error in journalism is to overestimate what the reader knows and underestimate the reader's intelligence.
Related are George Orwell's six simple rules:
1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
2. Never use a long word where a short one will do. 
3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out. 
4. Never use the passive where you can use the active. 
5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent. 
6. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.

The Atlantic on the new global elite

A couple of weeks old already, but still absolutely worth reading: The Atlantic on the rise of a new elite.

What is more relevant to our times, though, is that the rich of today are also different from the rich of yesterday. Our light-speed, globally connected economy has led to the rise of a new super-elite that consists, to a notable degree, of first- and second-generation wealth. Its members are hardworking, highly educated, jet-setting meritocrats who feel they are the deserving winners of a tough, worldwide economic competition—and many of them, as a result, have an ambivalent attitude toward those of us who didn’t succeed so spectacularly. Perhaps most noteworthy, they are becoming a transglobal community of peers who have more in common with one another than with their countrymen back home. Whether they maintain primary residences in New York or Hong Kong, Moscow or Mumbai, today’s super-rich are increasingly a nation unto themselves.

The enabling city

At its simplest, The Enabling City is a new way of thinking about communities and change.

Guided by principles such as collaboration, innovation and participation, the pioneering initiatives featured in The Enabling City attest to the power of community in stimulating the kind of innovative thinking needed to tackle complex issues ranging from participatory citizenship to urban livability.

We know that markets are no longer the only sources of innovation, and that citizens are capable of more than just voting during election time. We have entered an era where interactive technologies and a renewed idea of citizenship are enabling us to experiment with alternative notions of sustainability and to share knowledge in increasingly dynamic ways. We now see artists working alongside policy makers, policy makers collaborating with citizens, and citizens helping cities diagnose their problems more accurately.

What emerges, then, is a community where the local and global are balanced and mediated by the city at large, and where local resources and know-how are given wider legitimacy as meaningful problem-solving tools in the quest for urban and cultural sustainability.

Here, innovation is intended as a catalyst for social change — a collaborative process through which citizens can be directly involved in shaping the way a project, policy, or service is created and delivered. A shift from control to enablement turns cities into platforms for community empowerment — holistic, living spaces where people make their voices heard and draw from their everyday experiences to affect change.

So be surprised by how walks have the power to make neighbourhoods more vibrant, and how art can be used to convert dull city intersections into safe community spaces. Learn how creative interventions can unleash spaces for reflection and participation, and witness how online resources can lead to offline collaboration and resource-sharing. See how the values of Web 2.0 translate into the birth of the open government and open data movement, and what a holistic approach to financing can bring to local communities and cities alike.

This is what place-based creative problem-solving looks like in action. This is the power of the everyday.